|
THE DAWN OF A SECRET HOPE AND
THE END OF A GREAT CAMPAIGN
ALTHOUGH
one finds few references to the matter in the journals or letters, and
these only of the most glancing character, there is no doubt that the
General was moved by the immense interest in the Army at this period to
entertain the hope of converting the whole world.
He spoke of the matter to Bramwell Booth and also to the present writer.
He believed that it was possible to bring men and women of every degree
and temperament into the fold of the Salvation Army, and he even dared,
in certain moments of enthusiasm, to think that he himself might live
to accomplish this consummation.
The reader must remember that the campaigns of the General were events
of the first order in every country that he visited. No man of any nation
in the world had so wide a popularity among all the peoples of the earth.
Moreover, it must be carefully borne in mind that wherever he went the
General heard the most astonishing, the most dramatic, and also the most
pathetic stories of individual conversions. To hear one or two of such
stories must have kindled any man’s enthusiasm, but for a man of
William Booth’s temperament and faith to hear hundreds of these
stories told in every part of the world must clearly have been an inspiration
of irresistible power.
In a certain measure it may be said that he looked for a Second Advent.
He hated faddists with all his might, and he feared to find himself numbered
among the superstitious; he therefore kept almost entirely to himself
this dream of great world-conversion, this hope of a final victory over
Satan, this prayer for an absolute accomplishment of his heart’s
passion.
But there is no doubt that in secret he poured out to God this last and
tremendous longing of his soul, clinging to life with an ever-hardening
tenacity only that he might live to see the answer of his prayer and fall
adoring, on this human earth of sorrow and tears, at the feet of his Master.
We shall see from the concluding accounts of his visit to America, which
extended into the year 1903, that there was at least some justification
— if we remember the troubled beginnings of the Army — for
this pathetic dream of the old prophet. And from now onwards it will be
found that he moved, with an ever-multiplying band of followers, from
one triumph to another, enjoying such a universal popularity as I suppose
has fallen to the lot of no other religious leader.
His daughter Emma, with her husband, Commissioner Booth-Tucker, were the
organizers of these triumphs in the States:
Found
Emma waiting me in our car. She has come from Washington, where she had
spent Sunday interviewing Mr. Mark Hanna in reference to my approaching
visit to that City, and my dinner with the Members of the Cabinet, the
lunch with the President, Mr. Roosevelt, and other important things.
I cannot stop to record the story of her experiences, but it was quite
exciting, very interesting, and likely to prove useful to the Army in
the future.
A
somewhat formal account of the reception given by Senator Hanna in Washington
occurs in this journal:
I
had my usual effort (at sleep) after lunch, but failed, and now my head
was swimming and my heart was burdened to a border of distraction with
the supposed importance of the evening’s gathering, and of the part
I had to play in it. I threw myself on the bed, and succeeded in gaining
ten minutes’ sweet oblivion.
5 o’clock. Introductory interview with Senator Hanna. Found him
very friendly indeed, and seemingly anxious to do what was within his
ability for the Army. His personality impressed n-me at once. I wanted
no one to tell me that he was a born leader of men after I had conversed
with him ten minutes.
8 o’clock. The Dinner. Some of the most important guests had failed
at the last moment to put in an appearance on account of influenza. Of
this there is quite an epidemic in the city.
However, quite a number of influential men gathered around the beautifully
decorated table and partook of the dainties set before them, and when
they had well eaten and the cigars had been handed around, Mr. Hanna introduced
me with a few very hearty and appropriate words of recommendation respecting
myself personally and the work in general. I talked for an hour, got a
little confused here and there, and left unsaid some of the more important
things I wanted to say.
Still I talked freely out of my heart, and pleaded hard for my poor people.
Whatever my own opinion was of my performance (and it was not a very high
one, indeed quite the contrary), the views entertained respecting it by
every individual present, expressed in the frankest manner either in the
speeches made after I sat down or at the final handshake, were most favourable
to the Army, and of deepest sympathy with it and the most ardent desire
for its continued and increased success.
Describing,
in The Continent of Chicago, a dinner given in Washington by the late
Senator Mark Hanna, the Hon. Henry B. F. Macfarland, of Washington, said:
The
most interesting dinner ever given in Washington, so far as my knowledge
goes, was that of Senator Hanna, in honour of General William Booth. Senator
Hanna had been brought to know the Salvation Army in Cleveland by Governor
Herrick and his sympathetic and generous heart, so little known by people
in general, had gone out to the Army.
He had given largely of money, and even of time, in aid of its work in
Cleveland and in Ohio, and had, like Governor Herrick and other friends
of the Army, endured cheerfully ridicule from associates on account of
his avowed friendship for an organization which to men of the world seemed
bizarre and fanatical.
At the period of this dinner, it is true, the Salvation Army had lived
down most of the early opposition to it. But its unique Founder, General
Booth, had not yet received the official honours afterward heaped upon
him, and if he had died then, the President of the United States and the
Emperor of Germany might not have joined with the King of Great Britain
in honoring his memory. To most of the leaders in public life of the United
States he was practically an unknown quantity.
Senator Hanna himself had never seen the General, but hearing that he
was coming to the United States and Canada for a tour of meetings, the
Senator invited him to be his guest while in Washington — especially
the guest of honour at a formal dinner. General Booth accepted. At that
time the Senator was living at the Arlington Hotel, and he provided for
the formal dinner as elaborately as if it were for the President of the
United States.
The banquet was set for the evening of General Booth’s arrival,
and as he came in on a late train, he did not meet his host until he came
with the other guests into the reception-room. The General was very tired
with his journey. After the first exchange of greetings, Senator Hanna
and General Booth apparently found little to say to one another, and both
were relieved when the other guests began to arrive. These guests were
about fifty of the most important men in Washington at that time.
Except the President of the United States, practically every conspicuous
figure in the public life of the capital was present, including the Vice-President,
the Speaker, and members of the Supreme Court, the Cabinet, the Senate,
and the House. Almost all of them came to please Senator Hanna, and with
no feeling toward General Booth except, possibly, curiosity. Some, like
the then Speaker of the House, the late David B. Henderson, who looked
upon every dinner as a time for fun of all sorts, evidently expected to
get great amusement out of the occasion at Senator Hanna’s expense.
It was winter, and the air outdoors was cold, but it was no colder than
the moral atmosphere of the reception-room in which every one seemed to
feel an awkward constraint. After the introductions no one seemed to know
what to say to General Booth, and he said very little to anybody. The
announcement that the dinner was served came with more than the usual
amount of relief to the host and his guests, including General Booth.
The dinner proper passed off as dinners usually do, varied only by an
attempt on the part of Speaker Henderson to jest across the table with
Senator Hanna and General Booth, which Senator Hanna promptly and peremptorily
suppressed, saying, “Now, Dave, this is not that sort of a dinner.”
As may be imagined, this remark did not help to break the ice.
When at the close of the dinner Senator Hanna got up to speak, he was
evidently embarrassed. His brief introduction of General Booth was almost
colourless. When General Booth arose, he looked tired and ill at ease.
His voice was husky from the effect of the many speeches of his tour,
and he spoke in low tones. His first few sentences made no impression,
except, possibly, to add to the general feeling of coldness. Senator Hanna’s
face showed fear of failure.
Suddenly one of the Senators at the extreme right said, “Louder!”
This gave the old General just the shock which he needed. He threw up
his head and straightened out his form like an old lion suddenly roused
to action. Snapping back, “Oh, I can shout if necessary!”
he raised his voice so that it could be heard all through the banquet
suite. He spoke possibly an hour, continually gripping, more and more,
first the head and then the heart of his audience.
It was a memorable study to watch those who had never heard him before,
and he gradually overcame their indifference, disarmed their criticism,
and captured their attention, and, finally, admiration. His hearers were
the hardest men in the country to affect by speaking. All of them were
familiar with all the arts and tricks of every form of public speaking
— in courts, in Congress, on the stump.
No company of the same number could have been assembled in their country
at that time including more public speakers of experience and success.
Senator Hanna could not have selected for the purpose of resisting the
speech of General Booth a more formidable company of men.
But the Salvationist chief took them captive without their knowing how.
In form General Booth’s speech was not eloquent any more than his
voice, which, though strong, was rough and harsh. In truth, the speech
violated all the canons of oratory but one, and that the only one that
cannot be violated without failure. The canon, of course, is that which
requires sincerity and earnestness. It was evident that the speaker was
genuine, and it was equally evident that he was speaking of real life.
But it was most evident that he was speaking, as was said of Whitefield,
“like a dying man to dying men,” without thought of the outward
rank or popular reputation of those to whom he spoke.
When General Booth sat down he had completely changed the atmosphere of
the occasion, and the minds of all the men before him. Senator Hanna,
rising to speak, searched in all his pockets for a handkerchief, and not
finding one, picked up his napkin from the table and wiped tears from
his cheeks. He was not the only man who had not been able to repress the
tears. All were greatly moved, each according to his temperament. What
Senator Hanna then said was very different from what he said in his introduction.
But no words could equal the tribute of his tears.
Then followed a series of extraordinary informal speeches which were more
like confessions than like ordinary after-dinner addresses. One after
another the strongest men there, of different kinds, responded to Senator
Hanna’s invitation to give their impressions as well as they could
in words.
Vice-President Fairbanks, Speaker Henderson, Justice Brewer, Senator Hoar,
Mr. Cannon (then Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations in the House),
Senator Cockrell of Missouri (then the “watchdog of the Treasury”
in the Senate), and others of the same general character, made speeches
which would have astonished themselves if they had been made on any other
occasion, and which astonished their hearers as it was. None of them ever
spoke at any other time with equal eloquence — eloquence of the
highest sort, because brought from the very depths of their own lives.
For once they allowed their spirits freedom and threw aside conventionalities,
speaking from their hearts. It was interesting to see how each one of
them went back to whatever was spiritual and holy in his boyhood training,
or in the best moments of his past life, laying aside for the time all
that had since gathered over these memories.
It would be impossible to reproduce the speeches. No reporter of any kind
was present. Senator Hanna thought it would be best to have the freedom
of a perfectly private dinner, and while fragments of the proceedings,
gathered second-hand, were briefly printed by the local press in a very
inadequate and unappreciative way, no real report of it was ever published.
But even a stenographic report of it would have been entirely inadequate.
It would not have given any idea of the spirit of it all, expressed in
the manner as much as in the matter of what was said.
A characteristic incident was that Senator Cockrell, who, as guardian
of the public purse, was never known to suggest an appropriation if he
could possibly escape doing so, actually proposed across the table to
Mr. Cannon, then Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations and
“watchdog of the Treasury” there, that they should agree to
make an appropriation of public money for some Salvation Army institution
to be established in Washington. Nothing else said at the table was more
striking to those who heard them and who knew so well their customary
attitude toward appropriations.
The most notable of the speeches was that of Senator Hoar, of Massachusetts,
still in the full vigour of his powers. A Massachusetts Brahmin, a typical
representative of New England conservatism and culture, a critic armed
with great knowledge of men, books, and affairs, capable of the severest
analysis, he was then President of the American Unitarian Association,
the official representative of that church which does not approve of what
is commonly called “revival” or “evangelistic”
effort, and which of all the churches is supposed to have the least sympathy
with the teachings and methods of the Salvation Army.
Of all the men present, Senator Hoar was supposed to be farthest removed
from a personal sympathy with General Booth and his views and ways; therefore,
when he rose to speak everybody felt strangely stirred.
After giving his thanks to Senator Hanna for what he termed a remarkable
experience, he went on to say that he “took shame” to himself
that this great movement called the Salvation Army had gone on in his
own time without his ever really seeing it until that night. He had of
course, he said, seen the Salvationists doing their work in his own town
of Worcester, where he had frequently observed them at the street corners
holding meetings.
It showed how little he really saw of the meaning of it, he said, that
he had been on the point repeatedly of speaking to the leader of such
a meeting, and asking him whether he did not know that he ought not to
pray thus in public, but rather in secret, that he might expect that the
Father in Heaven would reward him openly. “I see now,” he
said, “how foolish, how fatuous such a remark would have been, and
am thankful that I never made it.”
He then went on to say that the story which General Booth had unfolded
was like that of the early Christian Church in the Apostolic age. He pointed
out the resemblances between the spirit of the early Church and that of
the Salvation Army. He recalled how the Apostolic Church also went to
the people and used the open air for their meetings, and sought the lowest
as well as the highest of men and women, and had power to help them to
change their lives, as in later periods, so much of the Church did not
have power. He spoke then of the courage, self-sacrifice, and heroism
of the Salvation Army in being like that of his beloved Pilgrims and Puritans
in England and Holland, and on the stern and rock-bound coast of Massachusetts.
Finally, after completing that parallel in his most eloquent manner, he
said that while General Booth had been speaking there had come back to
his mind an old-fashioned hymn which he learned in his boyhood, and which
he thought expressed the very purpose and life of the Salvation Army.
This hymn was called, he said, “The Heralds of the Cross,”
and he quoted several stanzas of it with evident feeling. It was an old-fashioned
evangelical missionary hymn, just such an one as the Unitarian Church
does not use, and his recital of it with such earnestness made a deep
impression on the company.
When Senator Hanna closed the speaking there was a general movement to
speak to General Booth personally, which was in great contrast both in
eagerness and in warmth to the reception he had been given on his arrival,
and the things that were said to Senator Hanna in acknowledgment of the
opportunity he had given his guests were very different from the conventional
expressions of gratitude on such occasions. Often since then men who were
present have spoken of this dinner as an experience that stands out separate
from all other meetings of that sort which they ever saw.
But
this dinner was only the prelude to other important events. General Booth
was received by President Roosevelt at the White House:
We
were ushered in in the most informal manner, and on entering found Mr.
Hay, Secretary for Foreign Affairs; Mr. Root, Secretary for War; and Mr.
Hitchcock, Secretary for the Interior. After introduction to these gentlemen,
I had a nice chat with them. We were shortly after joined by another gentleman
much interested in some kind of Slum Settlement in New York.
The President then entered, shaking hands all around in the cheeriest
manner. Mr. Roosevelt was accompanied by a Mr. Sargent, who, I was afterwards
given to understand, has a wide-world reputation as a Portrait Painter.
During the conversation at dinner I heard it stated that this Artist was
present for the purpose of painting a likeness of the President; Mr. Roosevelt
remarking that he had been through all the rooms at the White House that
had been proposed for the sitting, and had not found one suitable, until
in coming down the stairs to lunch Mr. Sargent had stopped him at a certain
point, and declared that that was just the very place and position that
would be suitable to his task.
We were soon seated and busy with the viands; conversation never flagged
for a moment, the President having a long way the lion’s share of
the talking. All manner of things were chatted about, some of them weighty,
and some of very much lighter importance, at least so they appeared to
me.
After a little while the President, who had seated me at his side, turned
to me and entered into conversation on the character of our work. He seemed
much interested in our Criminal operations, the efforts for the rescue
of the poor Lost Women, and the Colonization of the land.
Top |
Unfortunately
some business matter called his attention off, and he turned aside to
write a memorandum, and then something came about the Venezuela affair,
which Mr. Hay informed him was he believed near a hopeful settlement,
and so the talk drifted on until the repast was ended.
The President rose, assured me of the pleasure it had afforded him to
meet me, wished me good luck, and we all went our way.
But
of still greater interest was the next appearance of William Booth:
In
company with Senator Hanna and the Commander (Commr. Booth-Tucker) we
drove to the Capitol for the performance of the ceremony of opening the
Senate with Prayer, to which I had been invited.
I had not looked forward to this affair as being of any importance, but
it certainly turned out to be one of the most interesting if not remarkable
incidents of my life.
To begin with, Senator Hanna, who had so publicly taken me under his wing,
is one of the most important men in the United States, being looked upon
as what is publicly known as “The Boss of the Republican Party,”
and is beyond question a guiding spirit of the most powerful force in
the Country.
In
the second place, I found myself to be an object of interest to all the
most prominent Statesmen in the Senate, nearly all of whom sought me out,
being introduced by Mr. Hanna or others, or introducing themselves.
In the third place, I had the honour accorded me of being permitted to
occupy the floor of the House during the progress of the business; and
last, but not least, of bearing witness to the importance of the recognition
of God, doing His will, and caring for the hopeless and helpless classes
of the Community.
The House was unusually crowded, some people saying that the Galleries
had not been so packed for thirty years, while all agreed that no such
assemblage had taken place during this Session; and more remarkable than
the crowd in the Gallery was the attendance of the Senators themselves;
every man of them seemed to be in his place, and when the Vice-President
made the usual sign and I was conducted to the chair he usually occupied,
a sudden stillness fell upon the assembly.
Every head, they afterwards told me, was reverently bowed, while I asked
God’s blessing on the men chosen for so important a share in the
direction of the destinies of this great nation, and for wisdom and strength
to do the work to the Divine satisfaction, and for the highest well-being
of those concerned.
I must confess to feeling beforehand some little anxiety as to the way
I should be able to discharge this duty. While desirous, as I hope I ever
am when approaching the Mercy-Seat, to speak to God regardless of the
feelings with which my performance may be regarded by those around me,
I was still anxious that the few sentences I had the opportunity of speaking
and which I knew would be so closely criticized, and so widely circulated,
should carry with them useful lessons and inspire profitable feelings.
I had a dim recollection that three minutes was allowed for the function,
but altho’ I asked Senator Hanna and a few others, including the
Chaplain, I could get no definite pronouncement on the subject, the general
opinion being, I fancy, as I learnt afterwards was the case — that
I should not be likely to infringe on the Decorum of the House by taking
any unusual liberty in this direction.
As I stood there a world of feeling came rushing upon me; memories of
past struggles, influences of the kind things said about myself and my
doings, and the possibilities of the future, seemed all to come in upon
me, God helped-me as I lifted up my heart to Him, and He gave me words
which I believe not only reached His ear, but the hearts of many present.
I exceeded the three minutes, but I did not go far beyond the six —
and I do not think that any one has intimated that I went too far. A good
many would have liked me to have gone further!
A motion was afterwards passed ordering that the words of the Prayer be
entered in the Records of the House, and suspending the standing order
referring to the presence of strangers in the House. Then for an hour
I remained on the Floor of the Chamber, during which time I suppose I
shook hands with every important personage present.
There
is an amusing story in the journal recording his reception in Atlanta:
Banquet
of leading Citizens as a welcome. Fifty present, consisting of Judges,
Pastors, Bankers, and the like.
Fine feast of fat things, which I had to sit out chewing a bit of bread,
a potato and an apple to keep the Company in countenance.
After an hour’s wearisome dawdle, the Governor of Georgia, who was
the President of the Function, called on Mr. Witham to make the opening
remarks. This gentleman is an important personage in Atlanta. He was described
to me as the President of Twenty-four banks in and around the city and
two cotton mills, with a reputation for being the best after-dinner speaker
in the States, and the leader of a Bible Class composed of 200 members.
He certainly gave a five minutes’ hearty, earnest, and humorous
speech, saying that the reason Saul failed at Athens was the fact that
the City never gave him a proper reception, and that they were resolved
that my visit should not come to grief from the same cause, and therefore
they assembled together to assure General Booth of the great admiration
they had for him personally, the interest with which they regarded his
career, and the hearty wishes they call for the success of the work in
the U.S. in the future.
My talk came next, and I talked as well as I could under the circumstances,
with very little pleasure to myself, but giving great satisfaction to
all present, of which I was assured by each individual in the inevitable
handshake with which the affair closed.
Then
quite unexpectedly in the midst of these events we came upon a domestic
romance. He encounters a man who had been brought up by the Booths from
his childhood:
In
after years to our grief he had taken to bad ways — come to America,
gone to lower depths still, and was reported upon at last as being dead,
the money sent to provide for him in his sickness being returned with
the mournful message that he had passed away.
Here he was, however, alive and well, and apparently full of gratitude
for the kindness shown in the years gone by. I told him to come in the
morning and speak to me at the close of the meeting. On reaching my billet
the Consul was no little interested in the news. It was like a resurrection
from the dead.
Then
we find an entry which hints at the secret ambition of the General’s
soul:
I
was billeted with a Professor of the Clark University here, a very thoughtful
and intelligent man; he undoubtedly understands the Salvation Army as
well as any one I have met in the States and a long way better than most,
and sees in her ability for doing a great work, not only among the submerged
but the higher classes of society.
He urged on me the importance of making an attack on the Universities,
assured that we should reap a rich harvest of very superior young people
capable of the devotion, self-denial, and toil required for doing great
things in the world; he was very much interested in my University Scheme.
The Institute over which he presides appears to be of a superior sort,
expending its energies chiefly on the study of those Sciences which are
supposed to be necessary for the higher education; indeed they pride themselves
on the making of Professors.
He
prefers American journalism to English:
The
reports of the Secular Press were remarkably striking and religious, far
more Salvationary Sensational than many that appear in our own papers.
Amongst other things, in speaking of the waves of feeling that rolled
over the crowd it was remarked that “There were psychological moments
in the meetings when, if the invitation had been given, half the people
would have had to rush out to the Mercy-Seat.”
Everywhere
he goes the people throng to hear him:
The
Theatre was gorged to overflowing. As I entered half the gallery was all
but empty, that portion being set apart for the coloured population. I
asked why they did not fill it up with the whites. “Oh,” they
said, “no white man or woman would be seen there.” I thought
to myself, perhaps you may see some of them there before long.
As I anticipated, people poured into the despised space rather than be
shut out of the building altogether, and we were soon full in every part,
some having by some means climbed on to the roof while other unfortunates
did not get in at all.
In
the midst of this campaign he keeps up the regular correspondence with
Bramwell:
My
passionate love for everything that blesses and favours the Army and the
high position you occupy in its direction and control — no less
than my heart’s tenderest yearnings over you personally, make me
long to be ever talking to you. . .
Of
some one attached to his modest retinue he writes:
It
is no use complaining. . . . You have no need to fear about _____. I shall
manage him. I have started on the enduring tack; it is good for the work
of patience in my soul. Still he is a trial to me. Since I wrote this
he has acted like a bully to a reporter, etc.
My
eating is a great trial. I get awfully tired of the misery that seems
to follow almost every meal. I eat less and less, but I must eat something.
Emma
has gone back to San Francisco, a journey of 36 hours, to try and see
Mrs. Stanford again and to ask her straight out for a sum of money to
carry out my wish, the establishment of a Great Training Institution,
an International University for training men and women for dealing with
the sins and miseries of the submerged throughout the world.
There is a great rage here for Universities — I want to utilize
it. I don’t think I should have any difficulty much in getting a
million dollars for this object if it were to be fixed up in America —
England is the rub! However, Mrs. Stanford’s rich husband gave 20
millions before he died to the University she is establishing and she
has given 13 millions more since his death. I have sent her a letter by
Emma. . . Emma is full of faith. We shall see what comes of it.
A
very interesting reference is made to Social Work in one of these letters:
You
are puzzled, you say, with respect to our relations with the poor. I am
not surprised that you should be, but I think we have made it pretty plain
both to ourselves and to the public. There can be no question that the
Darkest England Scheme lifted us up to a position in public esteem the
world over, which we should never have gained in all human probability
for perhaps a century without it, even if then.
Moreover, it is right. It is in harmony with the teachings of Jesus Christ
and the very essence of a great deal of the Bible. It matches the promptings
of the human heart everywhere. If a man had a brother who was hungry and
homeless and naked, his first sense of duty would be to feed and house
and clothe him, doing it in the spirit of love and talking to him about
his soul all the time.
The same practice is called for by Jesus Christ when He says, “Thou
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” We are trying to do it. The
world can understand this sort of religion, and the world believes in
those who practise it, and belief in you has to be produced in the world
before it will get much benefit out of what you say on other things.
The danger lies in extremes. “Let your moderation be known unto
all men” is a text which grows more and more important in my estimation
every day. As to whether we get as much real benefit out of the time and
labour and ability bestowed upon feeding the poor as we should do if spent
in purely spiritual work is a very difficult question to answer.
We have a number of people, and shall have an increasing number of them,
who can do this work and cannot do the other. Let us employ them and make
the world pay for it. What I object to is using the time and ability of
men and women for Social Work who are required for the Spiritual, and
using money after the same fashion. This is not very plain, but you will
know what I mean.
Throughout
these letters one comes across expressions of humility, such as the following:
I
shall be only too glad to help you in any way which you feel most helpful,
that is within the narrow compass of my limited ability.
His
faith in Mrs. Booth-Tucker, whose tragic death was so soon to cloud his
old age, is expressed again and again:
I
have had a useful discussion with Emma this morning. She is a great pleasure
to talk to and a great strength for the future.
I am very pleased indeed to hear you have had a good talk with Emma. She
is indeed a marvellous conversationalist in my opinion, and has other
gifts which if I am not mistaken are destined to help you and the Kingdom
very considerably in the future.
Her soul yearns for affection and there is no one from whom a few extra
kind words will he more acceptable than yourself. Just take the hint,
please, without reference, and make a little extra joy and gladness in
her heart.
Emma is an untold comfort and support. She is much better (for the time
being, anyway) than for some years. May it last. But she works very hard
and is very venturesome. Too hard and too venturesome, I think. But it
is no use me saying her nay.
In
the month of March this, one of the most brilliant of all his personal
triumphs, came to an end:
The
close of the Campaign now draws near. A few more days and the closing
hour will be struck, the Celtic will be boarded, and we shall be away
from the land where we have been permitted to see such marvellous victories
of Grace.
Every minute of the day is laid out with work of one kind or another.
Farewell letters to dear Comrades. Friends all over the States. Good-bye
interviews to some of the leading people in New York City.
Articles promised for different secular and religious papers, together
with a reception this afternoon at the residence of Miss Helen Gould who
wants to see me. A handshake with the D.O., together with the preparation
of my farewell address at the Metropolitan Opera House, which comes off
the night before my departure.
The latter is now assuming somewhat remarkable proportions not only as
regards the number but the character of the audience expected. Mr. Hearst,
of journalistic fame, Mrs. Russell Sage, Miss Gould, and a number of others
of the Elite of the City have taken boxes. _____ has sent 250 dollars
for a Box.
While, on the other hand, the toughs and roughs of the Bowery (which is
the lower part of New York) have taken a part of the Gallery for themselves,
and I should like to be ready so far as my part of the Programme is concerned.
He
writes to Bramwell:
Depend
upon it, the United States is destined to be such a nation for Population,
Power, Intelligence, Wealth, and Energy as the sun has never looked down
upon. You can have no idea of the possibilities of this Pacific Coast
taken alone. San Francisco will probably at some near future rival London
itself.
And
to a newspaper representative of The Daily News he gave on his return
the following impression of his visit:
“Think
what a number of nationalities you have there. Look at the 800,000 Jews
in New York alone, the 40,000 Poles in Buffalo; think of the medley of
tongues and the clashing of interests. You might think the possibility
of disruption would be great. I don’t think so. Above everything,
there is throughout the States the love of the Flag — of unity —
that will subjugate all conflicting feelings, and ultimately mould the
people into one solid nation.
There is a great love of fair play in America — of that sort of
freedom which is not merely taught and advocated for party purposes. You
go into a room full of men of different nationalities, and you will find
them all jolly and friendly together. It is the same as if you go into
a gathering of Ministers of different Denominations — Episcopalians,
Baptist, Methodist, Quaker, or anything else.”
“There is great toleration?” inquired the journalist.
“Toleration!” shouted the General, “they don’t
need to mention the word. It is much more than that — it is the
recognition of every man’s right to hold what opinions he chooses.
As to myself, I was everywhere received with the greatest respect and
kindness, not only by religious people, but also by irreligious people.
“And nowhere was I received with greater respect than in Salt Lake
City by the Mormons! You may go about the shops and hotels and warehouses,
which I did, or into the homes of the people, which I didn’t, and
you would notice no difference from the ordinary run of society. I think
the question of Mormonism is largely one of secular prosperity. A man
goes out there and gets a chance immediately. He wants to have a bit of
land or a shop, and every help is given to him if he does right. I don’t
think religion has very much to do with it.
I held four meetings there, and the Governor himself presided, while the
head of the Mormon Church and his Bishops came arid listened to me, and
shook hands with me, and congratulated me on the remarkable gathering.
The Governor afterwards said to me: ‘Thank you for the meeting this
afternoon. That was certainly the strongest sermon I ever heard in my
life.’
“What was the subject of the sermon?”
“It was on the Past, Present, and Future of the Salvation Army.
This country could take a lesson from the Mormons in the matter of colonization.
Get hold of the men who have some fitness for the business, and give them
seed to sow and implements with which to cultivate the land, as well as
a horse; and let them pay you back again what you have expended on them.
That is the principle of the Mormons. They spend money on a man, who afterwards
has to return that money, as well as a tenth of all he produces.”
“And what about the spiritual life of America?”
“It is very much about the same as here. There is a great deal of
formality among the professors of religion, and a great deal of indifference
among the vast crowds — and, I think, of growing indifference —
largely as a result of prosperity and of the spirit of unbelief which
is rife everywhere. Yet I think their attitude towards religion is friendly.
They puzzle me, they bewilder me. They are different from the English
people. The American, I should say, is more religious naturally than the
Englishman. He thinks. You can pray in an American crowd, and they won’t
laugh at you. You can talk at the corners of American streets, and the
people will listen to you.
I never once saw a sneer or heard a jeer all the time I was there. You
see the difference in the newspapers. They are a perfect contrast to the
English ones. My meetings were reported in the newspapers of nearly every
City more fully than in The War Cry. They drew attention to the enthusiasm
and other features in conspicuous headlines, and they wrote down what
happened as if the writer understood what religion is.”
This
campaign in America, with its public receptions and preachings, its state
functions and conversions, its triumphal processions and quiet conversations
with public men, was typical of every campaign that followed. The General
of the Salvation Army had marched from cottage-meetings in the rookeries
of Nottingham to a public favour and influence which extended all over
the world. The same earnestness, the same humanity, the same simplicity
of soul which had characterized his first youthful preachings in Nottingham
streets characterized everything he did on this big platform of the world.
His attraction lay in that first transparent honesty, that first rugged
simplicity. There was a most stubborn conservatism in his soul which preserved
him from the dangers of popularity. He learned much as he went along,
his sympathies widened and deepened, but the essence of the man never
changed.
Chapter
22
Contents
|